User talk:TadejM

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Eleassar)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

MY TALK PAGE


Hello, welcome to my talk page. You are welcome to post any comments below. Please be polite and follow Commons guidelines.

-- coding taken from White Cat.

Notice: I will reply here. If you ask a question here, please check back regularly to see if I have replied (or add this page to your watchlist). I want my threads to be in the same place, because otherwise the comments will be scattered around and out of context.

-- coding taken from Timwi.


Leave me a message







Archives

  • Archive 1: May 2, 2005 – February 12, 2013
  • Archive 2: February 25, 2013 – July 30, 2019

Commons:Babel
sl
en-4
fr-3
de-3

Feel welcome to add new discussions under this line. --TadejM (t/p) 00:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Main page vandalism[edit]

You unintentionally participated in vandalism on the main page today, see the history of Template:Potd/2023-09-09 (en). Multichill (talk) 21:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. It seems as a misplaced edit rather than vandalism though. --TadejM (t/p) 21:51, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Slovene translation needs to be changed also. MZaplotnik(talk) 21:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done --TadejM (t/p) 21:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category discussion warning

Girdlers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 11:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023-10-14 Botanični vrt Sežana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Somewhat oversharpened, as usual with smartphone shots. But else very good – nice light and composition, atmospheric. --Aristeas 19:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]