Commons:Deletion requests/File:W3C Semantic Web Logo.svg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:W3C Semantic Web Logo.svg

It seems that the vectorisation was made by W3C and there is no evidence that the W3C has licensed this vectorisation. The vectorisation may be copyrighted as computer software, per w:Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. Stefan4 (talk) 11:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm against the deletion. W3C is clear for me. Wikipedia can use this file but if there is a problem, you can replace this picture with a PNG and you have to use a wikibot to replace this picture in Wikipedia... --Karima Rafes (talk) 16:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

• Delete: The W3C website states that the logos therein are available only for non-commercial use. Images on the Commons must be available for all uses. -- Diannaa (talk) 16:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
• delete OK for WP, not OK for Commons as the W3C has some (minor, but real) usage restrictions. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Deleted: FASTILY 08:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Restored: as per Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:W3C_Semantic_Web_Logo.svg. Yann (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:W3C Semantic Web Logo.svg

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Semantic Web.svg Andy Dingley (talk) 20:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

This is a non-free logo, based on a non-free component that has just been deleted from Commons. It's justified on the two wikis that use it (en & fr) and belongs there, but the license isn't appropriate for Commons. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Since 2013, "This deletion debate is closed." This image can be use in Wikipedia --Karima Rafes (talk) 21:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

This isn't Wikipedia, this is Wikimedia Commons. Are you aware that they're significantly different in terms of copyright? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons is in first "the platform for the contents of other projects". If you want start a crusade against all the logos I would prefer that you start with Microsoft. For me, the debate is closed. Sorry. --Karima Rafes (talk) 22:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

---

 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. The mentioned Microsoft logo is too simple for copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)