Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:STS-132- Liftoff Space Shuttle Atlantis.ogv

File:STS-132- Liftoff Space Shuttle Atlantis.ogv, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2010 at 08:32:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:STS-132- Liftoff Space Shuttle Atlantis.ogv Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:STS-132- Liftoff Space Shuttle Atlantis.ogv

•  Info created by NASA - uploaded by Kozuch - nominated by Kozuch -- Kozuch (talk) 08:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kozuch (talk) 08:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose commentator only provides data in obscure archaic units incomprehensible to 90% of the world's population - MPF (talk) 13:08, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Why didn't you nominate the higher resolution version? Although we don't have clear rules for a featured video, I think that most users would agree that the featured video should be in the best available quality. --Lošmi (talk) 19:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
  • In my opinion the video should get featured in all bitrate versions - when put into article, lower bandwidth versions are more accessible (because not everybody has fiber at home). --Kozuch (talk) 09:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Higher resolution version

•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:42, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose same problems as above of obscure archaic units incomprehensible to 90% of the world's population - MPF (talk) 19:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment It shouldn't be hard for someone who knows English, to convert miles to kilometers and pounds to kilograms. --Lošmi (talk) 02:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment But as a matter of principle, they must not be required to do so - MPF (talk) 09:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment If we are worried about the units then we could just as well be worried about the English language as well and require subtitles for everyone not knowing English. /Daniel78 (talk) 07:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Great footage, great quality. --Lošmi (talk) 02:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Citron (talk) 17:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - Jonathunder (talk) 01:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 18:32, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Kozuch (talk) 09:06, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 11:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Question Are videos eligible? A nomination of a video has been FPXed in July for that reason, see Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Yeager_supersonic_flight_1947.ogg. --Myrabella (talk) 19:23, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

 Comment If this is the first, I'd prefer NOT to start a trend. If we decide not to feature, we should also write it into the rules so that it's clear for nominators. --99of9 (talk) 03:21, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

On English Wikipedia, videos get normally featured as "Featured (motion) pictures". I see no reason why we could no do that here. Of course, including videos direcly in guidelines would be much better...--Kozuch (talk) 09:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Well, the discussion on Commons doesn't seem to have been very conclusive : Commons_talk:Featured_picture_candidates/Archive_5#Videos (maybe I didn't find the very last one on that topic, though). --Myrabella (talk) 09:46, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Note: File:STS-132 Liftoff Space Shuttle Atlantis 1080i.ogv is the highest resolution of the video, and the one that was chosen on the English Wikipedia for their FP. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 13:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animated

The chosen alternative is: File:STS-132 Liftoff Space Shuttle Atlantis 1080i.ogv