Commons:Deletion requests/File:Child Development Center, Play Area Inspection and Maintenance Program.pdf
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Child_Development_Center,_Play_Area_Inspection_and_Maintenance_Program.pdf[edit]
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Keep why in the world it's out of scope? Trycatch (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)- Keep IMHO valuable document.--Kozuch (talk) 14:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png)
Comment It's text only, so its contents belong on Wikisource. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 04:11, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not at all, originals (scans and so on) belong to Commons, the archive of the WMF projects -- see COM:SCOPE#PDF and DjVu formats. Wikisource, on other hand, could be compared to a typography or a publishing house -- they re-publish free content in their own arrangement, using their own style guidelines and so on. Trycatch (talk) 13:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Please read what i said, there was Comment in the beginning of the line, it was not a delete vote, i just pointed out that the contents belong on Wikisource. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 14:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, it was somewhat ambiguous however. Trycatch (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Please read what i said, there was
- Not at all, originals (scans and so on) belong to Commons, the archive of the WMF projects -- see COM:SCOPE#PDF and DjVu formats. Wikisource, on other hand, could be compared to a typography or a publishing house -- they re-publish free content in their own arrangement, using their own style guidelines and so on. Trycatch (talk) 13:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)