Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
54,178 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 48,682 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
 3,018 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,478 (4.6%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ввласенко (talk) on 2024-02-20 08:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Verónica (Suerte de capote)
Used in:
Corida
  • Britannica says that St. Veronica, who, according to Christian legend, wiped Christ’s brow with a cloth as he passed by on his way to Golgotha. Irrespective of whether the cape touches, this image shows nothing relevant to the Veronica pass. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Info La Verónica - the name of this technique was given by the image of Veronica holding in her hands the shroud on which the face of Christ was reflected. In my opinion, a comparison of traditional images of St. Veronica with the image I proposed demonstrates this clearly.

-- Ввласенко (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-21 17:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Hoogmolen (Aalbeke), view from Luingnestraat
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-21 22:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Eglise Saint-Aybert (Bléharies), view from Rue Wibault-Bouchart (Brunehaut)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2024-02-22 08:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Ficedula parva (museum specimens) (red-breasted flycatcher) eggs
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-22 09:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Sint-Amanduskerk (Bellegem), view from Bellegemplaats (Kortrijk)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-22 10:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Binche train station, view from Place Eugène Derbaix
Used in:
Global usage

 Support Best in scope. --Milseburg (talk) 14:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-24 13:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Aquila audax fleayi (Tasmanian wedge-tailed eagle) mobbed by forest ravens
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-22 11:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Petrochelidon nigricans nigricans (Tree martin) with nesting material
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-22 11:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Petrochelidon nigricans nigricans (Tree martin) in fight
Reason:
Other decent photo is WA ssp -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Milseburg (talk) on 2024-02-22 14:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Kreuzberg seen from Eierhauckberg
Used in:
de:Kreuzberg (Rhön)
Reason:
The mountain offering this view is located in a restricted military area. An opportunity for such a perspective arises rarely, only during brief openings of the ground every few years for two days. -- Milseburg (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-02-22 17:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Main entrance of the Baselgia rifurmada, Ardez
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Hemmers (talk) on 2024-02-22 15:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Steyr LP2 Air Pistol
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-02-22 18:55 (UTC)
Scope:
John P. Wronowski - IMO 9337432
Reason:
The tow boat, John P. Wronowski, is used in commercial and government tug and towing contracts around New London and Groton, Connecticut USA. This is the best view of this tow boat by name, uncluttered by submarines. -- GRDN711 (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rjcastillo (talk) on 2024-02-23 02:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Chonchi Church of Our Lady of the Rosary - Facade.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-02-23 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Calliostoma depictum, shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-23 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Teatro La Fenice (Venice) – Right Mascaron of the facade.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-23 06:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Ranunculus asiaticus - example of totipotency
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-23 06:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Christ at the column by Pietro Da Vicenza- Correr museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2024-02-23 07:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Muscicapa striata eggs (spotted flycatcher (striata)) eggs
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
FredD (talk) on 2024-02-23 11:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Ophioderma longicaudum in situ.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-23 11:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Ina (ship, 1955), bow and starboard view
@Agnes Monkelbaan: Thanks for your advice, ✓ Done perspective correction. --Pierre André (talk) 23:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-02-23 12:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Laocoon group Original c.AD27 (Vatican)
Reason:
Best in the scope -- Wilfredor (talk)

Need more detail as this subject has been covered/copied many times. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

what do you mean, more detail Wilfredor (talk) 15:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: What other photo should it be? File:Laocoon and His Sons black.jpg looks a bit cleaner to me, but is a modification of the nominated photo. This one is the current reconstruction of the group, it's the original group in the Vatican and not a copy, and it seems the best photo to me out of the category. Afaik, it qualifies for VI because of that. Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC) PS: Main author of dewiki's featured article on de:Laokoon.Reply[reply]
My version is from the vatican, its the original. The black background version is technically inferior and has some parts cut off, such as the edge of the snake on the left that was bitten in the process of turning the background black. --Wilfredor (talk) 10:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Scope should be something like Laocoon group Original c.AD27 (Vatican) Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: The replicas are in a subcategory, but the original pictures are just in Laocoon group category, are you sure that we need another sub category for the originals? --Wilfredor (talk) 21:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Let me know if its ok --Wilfredor (talk) 13:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-22 14:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Ptiloris victoriae (Victoria's riflebird) male
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-22 14:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Ptiloris victoriae (Victoria's riflebird) female
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-22 14:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Dendrocygna arcuata australis (Wandering whistling-duck) in flight
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gnom (talk) on 2024-02-23 16:35 (UTC)
Scope:
German Seafarer's Identification
Used in:
de:Seeleute-Ausweis
@Charlesjsharp: This is the official sample ID issued by the German government using a fake photo. See de:Erika Mustermann. Gnom (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gnom (talk) on 2024-02-23 16:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Hamburger Camerata and Simon Gaudenz
Used in:
de:Hamburger Camerata, de:Simon Gaudenz
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-02-23 17:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Pulpit in the Reformierte Kirche Zernez
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-02-23 19:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Happy Human symbol
Used in:
en:Happy Human, en:United States Department of Veterans Affairs emblems for headstones and markers
Reason:
Original version of widely used symbol, valid svg code. -- Thi (talk)
Done. --Thi (talk) 08:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Question Which image is the definite Happy Human in shape and colour? 13:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
The humanist movement does not have official colour. Black is the simplest option. [1] "In 1965, the British Humanist Association hosted a competition to create a symbol. The winning entry, submitted by London artist Dennis Barrington, was a letter 'H' with a large black dot above the crossbar, like the head of a person with arms raised." --Thi (talk) 14:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-02-23 19:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Atheist A circle
Used in:
en:Atheism, en:Atheist Alliance International, en.wikiversity.org, en.wikinews.org, es:Ateísmo
"The stylized 'A' is a generic atheist symbol, it was created by Diane Reed, and was the winner of a contest held by the Atheist Alliance International in 2007." "-- the copyright for this was released by the artist and it is extremely widely used. It is probably the only atheist symbol which is as ubiquitous as the happy humanist. AAI currently use a more stylised capital A in the form of a triangle." [2] --Thi (talk) 14:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-02-23 19:26 (UTC)
Scope:
AT symbols, Iniciativa Atea
Used in:
es:Historia del ateísmo
Yes. "This atheist symbol was created by Unión de CyberAteos. This symbol has been widely accepted within the Spanish and Latin based atheists’ communities, associations, forums, media and the like. It was designed by a collective effort among the members of CyberAteos back in 2000. After presenting different designs and holding several virtual democratic assemblies, it was decided almost unanimously to adopt this symbol as the Universal Atheist Symbol for the Spanish speaking atheist community." [3] --Thi (talk) 14:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-02-23 19:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Scarlet A
Used in:
en:Out Campaign
Yes. --Thi (talk) 14:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-23 23:24 (UTC)
Scope:
DC Mosa 1 (ship, 1969), port side and bow view.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-24 05:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Satyr head inv.129
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-24 05:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Cyclophora albiocellaria – mounted specimen Female dorsal

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-24 05:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Ivory diptych panel with Saints John and Paul in the Museo archeologico nazionale of Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-02-24 05:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Nemocardium bechei (De la Beche's Cockle), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2024-02-24 07:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Ficedula albicollis (museum specimens) (collared flycatcher) eggs
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-23 15:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Ptiloris victoriae (Victoria's riflebird) male displaying, side view
Reason:
  • I have no idea how many scopes we should have for this amazing display -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
  •  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-23 15:18 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Ptiloris victoriae (Victoria's riflebird) male displaying, three-quarter view
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-02-23 15:20 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Ptiloris victoriae (Victoria's riflebird) male displaying - front-on view
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Jaqen (talk) on 2024-02-24 14:56 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Claudio Sciarrone
    Reason:
    Best in scope imho: in File:Claudio Sciarrone - Lucca Comics & Games 2016.jpg he has a sad/tired expression, in File:Claudio Sciarrone, 2013.jpg his eyes cannot be seen. -- Jaqen (talk)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-02-24 16:59 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Flower bud of one Succisa pratensis devil’s-Bit.
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Jaqen (talk) on 2024-02-24 14:58 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Domenico Quirico
    Used in:
    d:Q3713201, it:Domenico Quirico, it:q:Domenico Quirico
    Reason:
    Only in scope. -- Jaqen (talk)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Rjcastillo (talk) on 2024-02-25 02:34 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Iglesia de Puqueldón (Church of Puqueldón), Lemuy Island, Chiloé.
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Rjcastillo (talk) on 2024-02-25 02:39 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Facade of Iglesia de San Francisco, Castro Church of San Francisco (Castro).
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Llez (talk) on 2024-02-25 06:13 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Nemocardium bechei (De la Beche's Cockle), left valve
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-25 06:53 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Francesco Morosini chases the Turkish armada April 1659, Museo Correr in Venice
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-25 06:56 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Thetidia plusiaria – mounted specimen Male dorsal
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-25 07:00 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Ancient Roman statues in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Marine Aphrodite
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Ercé (talk) on 2024-02-25 10:08 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Muscicapa striata eggs (spotted flycatcher tyrrhenica) eggs
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Wasiul Bahar (talk) on 2024-02-25 14:21 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant
    Used in:
    Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-02-25 16:36 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Organ of the Baselgia rifurmada, Ardez
    Used in:
    Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.

     Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Rocky Masum (talk) on 2024-02-25 18:54 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Shah Jalal Dargah Gate at night
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2024-02-26 02:27 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Certhia nipalensis (Rusty-flanked treecreeper)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Llez (talk) on 2024-02-26 06:13 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Calliostoma pulchrum, shell
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-26 06:13 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Doge Giovanni Mocenigo, by Gentile Bellini, Museo Correr in Venice
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-26 06:15 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Tibetan collections of the Musée Georges Labit - Tara. Female Bodhisattva
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-02-26 06:16 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Male portrait mid-1st century A.D. (inv.222)
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Ercé (talk) on 2024-02-26 08:02 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Petronia petronia (museum specimens) (rock sparrow (barbara)) eggs
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-26 11:54 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Ancienne chaufferie Huet (La Madeleine), view from Rue du Pré Catelan
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-02-26 15:55 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Sculpture of Charles Xavier Thomas in Square Thomas (Colmar)
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-02-26 15:56 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Collège Saint-Jean (Colmar) from East
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-02-26 15:56 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Maison Atthalin (Colmar)
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-02-26 17:10 (UTC)
    Scope:
    MS Nordkapp - IMO 9107772 – starboard view
    Reason:
    There are others but IMHO this is the best starboard view of this ship by name. I also like the typical light of early November heading north along the Norwegian coast. -- GRDN711 (talk)
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-02-26 22:12 (UTC)
    Scope:
    MG 3 (3rd generation) - left rear view
    Used in:
    en:MG3 (automobile)
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-02-26 22:13 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Kimera Evo 37 - interior
    Used in:
    de:Kimera Evo 37
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-02-26 22:14 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Renault 5 E-Tech - right rear view
    Used in:
    en:Renault 5 E-Tech, it:Renault 5 E-Tech Electric
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Pierre André (talk) on 2024-02-26 23:05 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Da Vinci (ship, 1936), port side view
    Open for review.



    Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

    Portrait of Vicente Guerrero[edit]

       

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) on 2021-01-21 17:47 (UTC)
    Scope:

    Retrato Vicente Guerrero por Anacleto Escutia en Palacio Nacional (Mexico)

    (Portrait of Vicente Guerrero by Anacleto Escutia in Palacio Nacional (Mexico))

    Previous reviews

    Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
    promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)    Reply[reply]
    Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    ErickTErick (talk) on 2023-10-31 21:45 (UTC)
    Scope:

    Retrato póstumo del presidente Vicente Guerrero en el Museo Nacional de Historia, Ciudad de México

    (Posthumous portrait of President Vicente Guerrero in the National Museum of History, Mexico City)
    Reason:
    The version of this image which currently considered the most valuable within its scope is of much lower quality than this newer version. In addition, the name given to the scope is factually wrong about the location of the painting (it is not within Palacio Nacional) and Mexico's Spanish name is misspelled (it's México, not Mexico). -- ErickTErick (talk)
    ✓ Done Started MVR ErickTErick (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

    El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach[edit]

       

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:02 (UTC)
    Scope:
    El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach

     Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    I am doing it according this reccomendation Ezarateesteban 23:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:00 (UTC)
    Scope:
    El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach

     Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

    Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar[edit]

       

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-01-22 12:21 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)
    Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
    promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)    Reply[reply]
    Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Gzen92 (talk) on 2023-12-29 07:22 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)

     Comment The light on the cble is a bit distracting. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
    To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
    Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

    All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

    Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

    Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

    Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
    Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"